1.                  TRANSPLANTED SEAGRASS BED MONITORING

Monitoring Requirements

1.1               Monitoring of the relocated seagrass bed (Halophila beccarii) for survival and growth at Pak Nai was required to be conducted quarterly during the construction phase of the Project as specified in Section 6.2.3 of the EM&A Manual.

Monitoring Equipment

1.2               Equipment used for monitoring included a 50x50cm quadrat, measuring ruler, digital camera and handheld GPS.

Monitoring Location

1.3               Monitoring was conducted at the 4 locations (A, B, C and D) on the intertidal flats at Pak Nai.

Monitoring Methodology

1.4               Sediment plugs on the intertidal flats at Pak Nai were relocated using visual markers that had been placed at each location at the time of transplantation, and using GPS.  Care was taken not to disturb each site by avoiding trampling.

1.5               At each location (dimensions of 1.5 x 1.5m), monitoring was conducted by our ecologist to measure presence/absence of seagrasses and seagrass cover.  Monitoring also included observations on seed germination, leaf size and general condition of any seagrass present.

Results and Observations

1.6               The eleventh quarterly survey to monitor the seagrass transplantation sites (A, B, C and D) was conducted on 20th September 2006 following relocation of sediment plugs in September 2003.  A photographic record of each transplantation site is presented in Figure 1.2.

1.7               During the monitoring visit, no seagrass was observed at any transplantation sites.

Site A       

1.8               Seagrasses were considered to have spread from the transplantation seagrass bed into the adjacent area and the mudflat did not detect any presence of seagrass in the last two monitoring surveys.  During the recent survey, about 30% coverage of seagrass was found in the transplantation site.  In addition, the seagrass was found close to the transplantation site in the recent survey.  It was considered that the seagrass spread from the adjacent area to the transplantation site.

 

Site C

1.9               During the December 2004 survey, a small number of about half a dozen seagrass leaves were found at the edge of the transplantation site in one of the corners.  In the survey in March 2006, coverage was about 50% of the transplantation site.  For the recent survey, the mudflat did not detect any presence of seagrass.  In addition, a cluster of grasses were found growing, from about 10% in the last survey to about 40% in the recent survey, and occupying the seagrass transplantation site area.  It was considered that the invasion of the grasses changes the condition of the transplantation site.  Due to the changes of biotic condition, the transplantation site might become unfavourable for the growth of the seagrass, which would respond to the unfavourable condition.  Based on the observation in the previous surveys, it was expected that the seagrass has spread into the area adjacent to the transplantation site.

Sites B and D

1.10           Similar to the previous surveys, no seagrass was detected in transplantation sites B and D by close observation of the mud surface.  At sites B and D, no seagrass plants were present growing on the sediment previously identified as supporting seagrass in the EIA report.  Although the transplanted sediment may contain seeds derived from previously existing seagrasses growing on the sediment, monitoring observations revealed no evidence of germination since the previous monitoring survey.

Conclusions

1.11           Monitoring of relocated sediment plugs was conducted at 4 locations on the Pak Nai intertidal flats on 20th September 2006.  In the recent survey, seagrass was only observed on the mudflat at Site A.  At Site A, it was considered that the seagrasses have spread from the adjacent area to the transplantation site.  At Site C, it was considered that the seagrass has spread into the area adjacent to the transplantation site because it responded to the unfavourable condition.  At the two other locations (Sites B and D) monitoring observations indicated that there was no evidence of seed germination despite the possibility that the relocated sediment may contain seeds deposited by seagrasses living on it that had since disappeared.